The Impossibility of the Wenderoman: History, Retrospective, and Conciliation

Authors

  • William Donahue

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5399/uo/konturen.4.0.3191

Abstract

“The Impossibility of the Wenderoman” argues against the conventional conception of the Wenderoman (and of thematically related films and plays) that views it essentially as a kind of cultural document of the German “Wende.” Placing the question within the larger problematic of historical fiction and political literature, this paper notes first that the very genre is itself an impossibility insofar as its boundaries are ever-expanding. The quintessential contribution of the genre, this paper argues, is twofold: retrospective and “conciliatory.” It is the first insofar as we are willing to look beyond literature and film that focuses principally on the Wende per se, and instead take Unification as a juncture from which truly to look back (taking advantage of the new temporal perspective given us by “the turn”), and thus reevaluate Cold War conventions, specifically those governing German-German and German-American cultural relations that often went unquestioned in the postwar period. In other words, the Wenderoman dimension I elaborate (drawing especially on Kempowski’s Letzte Gruesse) may contribute to a more profound understanding of the period it “closes” than the one it ostensibly celebrates and inaugurates. Secondly, the Wenderoman functions as a prominent vehicle of cultural memory, preserving various moments of a Marxist-inspired social agenda for future generations. Agamben’s notion of “the contemporary” as well as foundational concepts of “cultural memory” are useful here. The discussion features well-known films (Good Bye, Lenin! and Das Leben der Anderen), theater (Brussig’s Leben bis Maenner), as well as several novels. Whether this process of cultural “sifting” will remain purely elegiac, or serve as a resource for imagining alternative social possibilities in the future is of course impossible to know—both because it is far too general of a hypothesis, and still far too early to tell.

Author Biography

William Donahue

William Collins Donahue is the author of The End of Modernism: Elias Canetti’s Auto-da-fé(which won the 2002 MLA Scaglione Prize for best book in Germanic Languages & Literature) and, more recently, of Holocaust as Fiction: The “Nazi” Novels of Bernhard Schlink and Their Films (New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2010; paperback 2012). The latter book has appeared in a longer version in German as Holocaust Lite: Die “NS Romane” von Bernhard Schlink und ihre Verfilmungen(Bielefeld: Aisthesis, 2011). Donahue has written on nineteenth-century poetic realism (Buechner, Gotthelf, Drost-Huelshoff) as well as numerous articles on contemporary literature. With Martha Helfer, he co-edits the biennial book series Nexus: Essays in German Jewish Studies(Camden Hosue), and serves on the editorial board of Amsterdamer Beitraege zur neueren Germanistik. With Jochen Vogt he edits the annual andererseits: Yearbook of Transatlantic Studies. William Donahue is Professor in German Studies, Jewish Studies, and in the Program in Literature at Duke University, where he serves as Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literature.

Downloads

Published

2013-05-13

How to Cite

Donahue, W. (2013). The Impossibility of the Wenderoman: History, Retrospective, and Conciliation. Konturen, 4, 167–204. https://doi.org/10.5399/uo/konturen.4.0.3191